You have all forgotten the simple and inexpensive solution! Dedicated underground storage
Plus the collection of abandoned wood for heating.
Plus showers and wash in cold water.
Plus the bike where you pedal backwards to make electricity.
More exercises to suppress drugs ....
There are only simple and inexpensive solutions to do without oil.
Excuse me, a sudden urge to mess around .......
jc
French oil consumption
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79312
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11038
Ah ah ah, it looks like some people will miss it anyway ...
https://www.econologie.com/forums/post244654.html#244654
https://www.econologie.com/forums/post244654.html#244654
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5111
- Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
- Location: Isére
- x 554
Obamot wrote:Could you explain something to us STP: you who are called in electricity, in order to better understand?
The “FULL NEED” energy (all sources combined), would correspond to 18 TWh / year (according to the Désertec project, here ...> )
I do not know how much it is in PET, I get lost in the orders of magnitude (and to compare with what the author of the thread says, but whatever).
Since we know that a 160 MW solar thermal power plant would cost $ 1 billion according to this post:
https://www.econologie.com/forums/post242187.html#242187
Reported in MWh / year, how many power stations of this type would it take to cover the FULL NEED?
Then it would be enough to divide the consumption per capita and per year, to see what total amount we would arrive ...? (After adding the equivalent KWh / year for domestic heating + sanitary water, and per capita, of course! Figure which is not included in these 400 €, but how much?)
So we could better assess the potential of this "solar thermal".
but what does this diversion do?
The subject is oil.
And you reduce yourself to deflecting the thread on energy in general.
As far as I know gasoline cars and diesel vehicles (passenger cars and utility vehicles) still work on fuels.
The transition to electric is still extremely slow in fact.
and then the 400 € that you take back it was a post from 2007!
I'm not saying that the subject of "FULL NEED" is not interesting, but there must be another adequate thread to talk about it, right?
The diversion of wire is a wound of this forum. (Dedeleco champion out of category).
0 x
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
2007 yes, but who unearthed this subject?
It is completely in phase since we are talking about TEP = Tons of Oil Equivalent.
Regarding to do without oil ... Given its cost which follows an exponential curve.
It seemed to me that to compare the amount of the total annual energy expenditure of fossil energy per head of pickaxe, to that of the cost of substitution renewable energy to determine its feasibility, was not uninteresting (although a large difference Dedelco (s) mique, I concede it ... ^^)
It is completely in phase since we are talking about TEP = Tons of Oil Equivalent.
Regarding to do without oil ... Given its cost which follows an exponential curve.
It seemed to me that to compare the amount of the total annual energy expenditure of fossil energy per head of pickaxe, to that of the cost of substitution renewable energy to determine its feasibility, was not uninteresting (although a large difference Dedelco (s) mique, I concede it ... ^^)
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 6 Replies
- 54391 views
-
Last message by elephant
View the latest post
05/06/09, 17:48A subject posted in the forum : Economy and finance, sustainability, growth, GDP, ecological tax systems
Back to "Economy and finance, sustainability, growth, GDP, ecological tax systems"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 155 guests