Ahmed wrote:Obamot wrote:Obamot wrote::|It's hard to find high-value products today to try to do the trick.Obamot wrote:Ahmed wrote:Do you like my story?
( )
And yes, those who know the Mac, and who made a good living with (computer easy to ... 1984-2004 era) ... have lived! Since everyone had access to graphical interfaces, and cheap RAM (at the time 1 mega Valley 4'000FF !!!) everyone finally could afford a cheap computer and do the same job (they thought), but in the meantime ... we left feathers!
Yes, that's the way it should be described. The market economy is a mirage turning into a nightmare! (Although it is already ex officio for some and for a long time for others ...)
It is difficult today to find high value-added products to try to succeed. The problem is that whoever gets there will be de facto "in the direction of the current"!
Then there are those who float and those who already have their heads under water! Alas.
So yes, the meager solution I gave is a form of therapeutic relentlessness (ie disconnect the real economy).
— It seems to me that at first, it is a fair and relatively realistic solution!
See how easy it is to get to "Self-persuade"
The modern version of butter + butter money + dairy etc, is already in my signature ...
Yes, and the bet is higher and higher, depending on the decreasing returns that apply roughly: more investment is needed to increase productivity.
The "real" economy is a lure for the reasons already mentioned and also because, in its abstraction, it encompasses the useful, the useless and the downright harmful productions and treats them all on the same footing: that of the value which results from them. results.
Ahmed wrote:Obamot wrote:..the meager solution I gave is a form of therapeutic relentlessness (ie disconnect the real economy).
Only, indeed a disconnection of the economy and a reorganization of the activity on other bases to be defined will make it possible to avoid the evolution towards a progressive chaos (it is not won!).
Curiously, I would almost be of the opinion that we should return to the era of cartels (in the good sense of the term).
Because I do not see an isolated company, to stand alone! On the other hand, a group could more easily defend itself by carrying out concrete actions.
In my corner, there is for example this:
wiki wrote:WIR Bank is a Swiss banking institution that issues its own currency to facilitate economic exchanges between its members. Its headquarters are in Basel. WIR is the abbreviation of the German word Wirtschaft which means economy.
The WIR bank is an organization Nonprofit [ ] It serves the interest of customers. It is a very stable system, little inclined to failure, or systemic crisis, as in the current banking system. It remains fully operational even in times of general economic crisis.
WIR may have contributed to the remarkable stability of the Swiss economy, as it cushioned the slowdown in the business cycle.
Currently in Switzerland, one in five SMEs uses WIR
It now has more than 60 SMEs among its partners who practice a payment system without cash
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banque_WIR
Bank website:
http://www.wir.ch/index.cfm?DC86BF333C1 ... _lang_id=8
Without cash? But what do they live on then? How do they pay their rent? Their supplies? Salaries?
Recently, the WIR currency is convertible (1 WIR = 1 CHF).
So why not government bonds in WIR?