pb2488 wrote:If without doing anything, people have what it takes to survive, I do not see what will motivate them to work / produce.
Uh, how to maintain survival is not the principle of rmi / rsa and all other social minima?
pb2488 wrote:If without doing anything, people have what it takes to survive, I do not see what will motivate them to work / produce.
pb2488 wrote:We are very close to a communist system, it seems to me.
pb2488 wrote:If without doing anything, people have what it takes to survive, I do not see what will motivate them to work / produce.
pb2488 wrote:For now, it's the bosses who pay for it (in part, the rest goes into debt).
bernardd wrote:What is the most communist?
When the 16 000 billion of money supply and outstanding loans are controlled by a nomenklatura of less than one hundred bank owners, co-opted between them, receive 1 500 billions of euros of currency created per year and 700 or 800 billion of interest, and only finance industrial projects that serve their interests?
Or when the monetary system is organized as a joint-stock company of which all shareholders receive a dividend on economic activity, the very definition of capitalism?
pb2488 wrote:Sorry, I still do not follow you ...
pb2488 wrote:Bank owners control the money supply?
pb2488 wrote:Who are these 100 owners?
pb2488 wrote:It is not the shareholders who own the private banks?
pb2488 wrote: It is not the central banks that set the key rates?
pb2488 wrote:Moreover, in the US, the state still has the right to beat its currency.
pb2488 wrote: However, it is one of the most liberal countries
pb2488 wrote: The solution to the debt is the reduction of deficits. It's like a household or a business ....
Back to "Economy and finance, sustainability, growth, GDP, ecological tax systems"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 139 guests