Who's mixing it all up?
It's you !
We pass aptitude that humans have to be able to eat and assimilate plants as well as meat to the ability to kill and rape anyone, even children and animals ...
You invoke
the ability to… Not an anatomical or biological demonstration, therefore
aptitude that would justify anything, I show another…
aptitude to do, nothing more.
When to digest and assimilate, “mad” cows digest and assimilate
also animal meal, cannibals
also. so what happened is beyond simple apparent digestive faculties and biology allows us to respond to it, not culture and traditions.
and that it would be "a majority of the populations who engage in it" (sic).
I added
DIH because this claim to be omnivorous is practiced by a majority of populations. Simply because it is part of customs and mores, not in the scientific field to which few of these populations have access and you talk about culture, habit, manners
I do not know if it is stupidity or pure scam ...
On this side there, you are not outdone then.
And in addition, the gentleman asks for proof when it suffices to note the fact that we eat everything, indifferently, since the dawn of time on this planet.
I do like all those who are faced with pseudo scientific claims and who are unable to demonstrate it other than to say that it is enough to note that. At that time we can also say that the earth is flat, [*] if that is enough and I doubt that you believe it either.
Ps: It was you who on another thread declared that we were opportunistic carnivores then hunter-gatherers
Yes it's
ALMOST what I said ! I wrote picker /
SCAVENGER out of opportunism for reasons of survival. It only becomes a gatherer / hunter after the invention of weapons and it also feeds on it opportunistically when other foods are lacking, depending on the season, because it only eats raw.
https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ACY ... UFl9FUu8JMfew, if any, scenes of retaliation.
Food expediency, therefore, has nothing to do with anatomobiology, which determines families and eating skills.
Placed in the middle of a desert without vegetation, a human, to survive, will eat everything that can keep him alive and the same in glacial regions, it is a matter of survival, not culture or morals. Some in extreme conditions are even reduced to drinking their urine and eating their shit, full of useful minerals, it does not make it a rule of life so far.
[*] and it's easily demonstrable!
Ahmed @
I think it should be read that rape, etc, is seen within a majority of populations ...
which amounts to the same thing; even though I force the line to emphasize this aspect on the aptitude side. for my part, to say that this can be seen is to minimize a situation which is indeed a practice, not just anecdotal.
What if we stayed first on anatomical considerations?
Oh yes! Oh yes!
and the table above is just not, it's just an abstract ... evolutionary point of view.
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré