The commercial scams of the environmentalism [today waves and CMO MF05]

[GuyGadebois]

But Guygadebois would certainly be one of the first to yell if suddenly he was asked to pay 3% more on his bill (around 5 € / MWh) so that nuclear power is no longer sold "at a loss"!

I already pay much more than what my invoice indicates ... So 3% declared more, I do not care royally. Anyway, in 1 month they come to ask me a Linky and EDF will be seen, I will change supplier .... but I will continue to help keep it afloat bottomless thanks to taxes.

Ah, sorry ... But as you told us a few weeks ago that your income was only € 500 / month (rent), I could hardly imagine that you were taxable ....
Taxing people with such low incomes is truly a scandal!

I am not a hermit, you are furiously lacking in imagination ... Do you know what a tax household is?

[sicetaitsimple]

I am not a hermit, you are furiously lacking in imagination ... Do you know what a tax household is?

Ah, you live on your wife's hooks? You are quite right!

[Exnihiloest]

Yes, because of the sale at a loss ...

USA: 99 nuclear reactors (25% of the operating power in the world).
China: 46 nuclear reactors, fleet increasing.
Russia: 35 nuclear reactors

And as everyone knows, the USA, China and Russia are philanthropic countries, their companies or public services sell at a loss.

Price in the USA: less than 6 euro cents per KWH in some states and more than 10 in others.
Germany: 23,3 euro cents, hello wind turbines.

Nothing to beat of these figures we talk about EDF ...

No. You don't talk about the subject, then.
I recall the words of Eric Dupont:
"Nuclear power is not the best solution to fight against global warming. It is more expensive."

It is not a question of EDF but of the cost of nuclear power, and as the figures show, nuclear power is not expensive, and where there is no nuclear power, electricity is expensive.

The facts are going against you, it seems.

[GuyGadebois]

The facts are going against you, it seems.

Not at all, wind has become cheaper than nuclear ... not yet everywhere, of course, but taking into account the artificial price (dumping) of nuclear, this is the case.
https://www.courrierinternational.com/a ... -nucleaire

[Ahmed]

I would be sorry if the facts "are against you", my poor Guy!

[GuyGadebois]

I would be sorry if the facts "are against you", my poor Guy!

Not just the facts, the idiots too!

[Eric DUPONT]

No. You don't talk about the subject, then.
I recall the words of Eric Dupont:
"Nuclear power is not the best solution to fight against global warming. It is more expensive."

It is not a question of EDF but of the cost of nuclear power, and as the figures show, nuclear power is not expensive, and where there is no nuclear power, electricity is expensive.

The facts are going against you, it seems.

If there is a little question of EDF concerning the commercial scams of the ecologism. Since EDF clarified that nuclear power is the best solution against CO2 emissions

[izentrop]

[Exnihiloest]

I would be sorry if the facts "are against you", my poor Guy!

Figure of speech called "personification". Like what, Ahmed, the economy does not lead to everything.

[Exnihiloest]

https://youtu.be/pAOFLYf405Y

It's reassuring to see that he currently has 7500 likes against 41 dislikes.
All is not lost !