The commercial scams of the environmentalism [today waves and CMO MF05]

[Exnihiloest]

...
Yes it is known, it is even with the deleterious effect of radar waves that microwave ovens were made, I know the story. "But it's safe", isn't it?

You are reinventing lukewarm water.
It is safe at the usual levels, as I said in the other thread, you are 12 days late:

"For non-ionizing electromagnetic frequencies, the only risk ever highlighted is the thermal risk, zero risk in practical cases of mobile telephony. A 2W laptop, even if no power was radiated and all its power heated your head, would be much less dangerous than a summer sun (1KW / m², with much higher frequencies)."
"I invite those who want to prove the danger of waves to take courses in contortionism, then to settle in their microwave oven, then to launch it at full power ."
Health-pollution-prevention / health-the-dangers-real-of-5g-t16095-100.html # p376305

Do you know that your body is radioactive? And yet you survive, right? It is all a question of dose.

[GuyGadebois]

Once again, it's because you say it or believe it is correct.

[Exnihiloest]

Once again, it's because you say it or believe it is correct.

I do not do in the gospel word. What I am saying is easily verifiable is basic scientific knowledge. You just have to wiggle your ass a bit in research, or even in scientific training in the field to understand, and give up your infused science which would have the last word on everything.

[GuyGadebois]

Once again, it's because you say it or believe it is correct.

I do not do in the gospel word. What I am saying is easily verifiable is basic scientific knowledge. You just have to wiggle your ass a little bit in search <<< "Just cross the street ...", or even in scientific training in the field to understand, and to give up his infused science which would have the last word on everything.

What is easily verifiable is that you are far from being reliable and that some scientists are at odds with others concerning these questions. You have chosen your side, me mine. The rest is hard work. blabla de gâteux: “I have a scientific background so I know what I'm talking about, you don't even understand the basics of these issues.” Go show yourself (twice).

[Eric DUPONT]

Once again, it's because you say it or believe it is correct.

I do not do in the gospel word. What I am saying is easily verifiable is basic scientific knowledge. You just have to wiggle your ass a bit in research, or even in scientific training in the field to understand, and give up your infused science which would have the last word on everything.

If the EDF engineers did a little more research they would stop saying that nuclear is the only solution when they know perfectly well that it is not true, but try in vain to orient public opinion to obtain financing. If it is not a deception what is it?

[Exnihiloest]

...
If the EDF engineers did a little more research they would stop saying that nuclear is the only solution when they know perfectly well that it is not true, but try in vain to orient public opinion to obtain financing. If it is not a deception what is it?

They don't say it's the only solution. It is not the only but the best, in the current state of our knowledge and our economic means.

[Exnihiloest]

.. "I have a scientific background so I know what I'm talking about, you don't even understand the basics of these issues". Go show you (bis).

That's right.
Going to see you is the option of choice until you can show us the real dangers of the airwaves, in which case I will be the first to look at the facts presented. Someone would have died, someone would have been disabled, someone would have been injured?

[GuyGadebois]

.. "I have a scientific background so I know what I'm talking about, you don't even understand the basics of these issues". Go show you (bis).

That's right.
Going to see you is the option of choice until you can show us the real dangers of the airwaves, in which case I will be the first to look at the facts presented. Someone would have died, someone would have been disabled, someone would have been injured?

We will see the result of these exhibitions in a few decades, if of course everything does not collapse before, which is very possible.

Even the ANSES whose positions we know says:
"The opinion does not highlight any serious and immediate danger, but stresses that the results of scientific studies published to date do not make it possible to exclude the appearance of biological effects in humans beyond certain thresholds. "

[plasmanu]

https://information.tv5monde.com/info/u ... ire-343281

[dede2002]

We do not know what it is, but if half of the 17000 devices allegedly built did not see the light of day, is that the other half was built ???