Leaves of Stevia = 100% Natural Sweetener

Consumption and sustainable and responsible diet tips daily to reduce energy and water consumption, waste ... Eat: preparations and recipes, find healthy food, seasonal and local conservation information food ...
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 26/04/11, 14:29

It is not science fiction that is derailed, but reality at the forefront of research:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v4 ... 2042a.html

https://www.econologie.info/share/partag ... qQAE5v.pdf

We are starting to be able to form the shape of an eye from a stem cell !!

Reality is much more interesting than fiction !!
In particular the conditions which make it possible to reconstitute an organ, ultra-easy in plants, but much more complex for animals !!

Elucidation of the underlying mechanisms
embryonic eye development
REGENERATIVE MEDICINE
diy eyes
In this issue, Eiraku et al. 1 provide a series of extraordinary videos recording the formation
of an embryonic mouse eye: for the first time, we see unfolding in real time the beautiful events that shape the early stages of mammalian eye development. But even more remarkable is that these are not recordings
from live animals, but of self-organizing three-dimensional (3D) cultures of embryonic stem cells.
By the sixth week of human development, the rudiments of the mature eye are visible: bilayered optic cups, partially encapsulating the lens vesicles, have formed from the eye-field region of the anterior neural plate and the overlying surface ectoderm (Fig. 1) . From the inner layer of the cup, the complex laminar structure of the neural retina will develop, with light-sensing photoreceptor cells connecting through interneurons to the retinal ganglion cells whose axonal processes project to the higher visual centers in the brain.
Elucidation of the underlying mechanisms
embryonic eye development began more
51than a century ago. In one of his most significant
experiments, Hans Spemann, a founder of developmental biology, showed that if the optic vesicle (the structure that eventually evolves into the optic cup) is destroyed, the lens fails to form. The interaction of the surface
ectoderm (from which the lens derives) with the underlying optic vesicle has been considered a classical example of embryonic induction - the process by which one cell group signals to a neighboring group and influences their future development. An array of genes has now been identified, many of which encode transcription factors or growth factors that are essential for the formation of the optic cup.


Generation of complex organs in vitro is a major challenge in regenerative medicine. But it is not an impossible one: an entire synthetic retina has now been generated from embryonic stem cells. See Article p.51than a century ago. In one of his most significant
experiments, Hans Spemann, a founder of developmental biology, showed that if the optic vesicle (the structure that eventually evolves into the optic cup) is destroyed, the lens fails to form. The interaction of the surface
ectoderm (from which the lens derives) with the underlying optic vesicle has been considered a classical example of embryonic induction - the process by which one cell group signals to a neighboring group and influences their future development. An array of genes has now been identified, many of which encode transcription factors or growth factors that are essential for the formation of the optic cup.
The likelihood of growing a complex organ such as an eye in a dish, however, has seemed remote and futuristic, although this remote frontier of regenerative medicine constantly moves closer. In the past decade, inspiring work2 has shown that expression of eye-field transcription factors can lead to eye formation
in unusual locations along the body of
Xenopus frogs. Moreover, following the
generation of human embryonic stem (ES) cells, it has proved possible 3,4 to direct their differentiation towards the retinal lineage and generate both retinal pigmented epithelium
(RPE) and retinal neurons (Fig. 1). Cell-
culture approaches have mainly sought to maximize the development of specific cell types with the potential aim of transplanting such cells for therapeutic purposes.
In vitro, RPE cells derived from ES cells self-organize into a characteristic simple monolayer. By contrast, reproducing the more complex and precise laminar organization of the neural retina presents a difficult tissue-engineering challenge. But reports describing lens-like structures5 and retinal progenitor rosettes in ES-cell cultures6 hinted at some potential for organization of eye tissue in vitro.
Now, Eiraku et al. 1 (page 51) reveal with startling beauty and remarkable clarity that the complex process of evagination of the optic vesicle, and then its invagination to form the bilayered cup, can occur spontaneously
in culture, starting with a population of homogeneous pluripotent cells - cells that can
differentiate into any cell type (see Fig. 1 of the paper1 and the supplementary videos).
The key to this advance was that Eiraku and colleagues did not just just simplify their previous7
differentiation protocol for ES cultures, but also added Matrigel, which includes extracellular-matrix components. Under these conditions, and using a green fluorescent protein
(GFP) reporter gene expressed in the eye field and the neural retina, they found that a neuro-epithelium-like layer of GFP-positive cells evaginated from the sides of hollow balls of ES cells, in a process reminiscent of optic-vesicle formation . Over time, the optic vesicles spontaneously underwent dynamic morphogenesis
and formed two-layered cups.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79323
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11043




by Christophe » 11/10/14, 14:06

From "green" coca-cola to stevia: http://leplus.nouvelobs.com/contributio ... onnel.html

But it is far from compensating for the other crap crap!

In short the best is to do without!
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491




by Janic » 11/10/14, 14:39

absolutely! The problem of stevia is to reproduce the phenomenon of palm oil because to serve as a substitute like aspartame, it would be necessary to deforest and replant immense regions of this plant. (8.000.000.000 consumers of Stevia !) We have many natural sugars without looking for these products.
0 x
User avatar
Cuicui
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3547
Registration: 26/04/05, 10:14
x 6




by Cuicui » 11/10/14, 14:48

Janic wrote:absolutely! The problem of stevia is to reproduce the phenomenon of palm oil because to serve as a substitute like aspartame, it would be necessary to deforest and replant immense regions of this plant. (8.000.000.000 consumers of Stevia !)
You forget that everyone can plant stevia at home (don't forget to bring them in in winter).
Last edited by Cuicui the 11 / 10 / 14, 14: 50, 1 edited once.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79323
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11043




by Christophe » 11/10/14, 14:49

Bullshit Janic: for having planted stevia, I am convinced that the yield in "sweetening power" per hectare of stevia is far superior to all the other methods (beetroot, sugar cane ...) and even notice that delnoram: it is possible and much easier to plant stevia at night than to "manufacture" sugar!

We have many natural sugars without looking for these products there.


Ah well which?
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 11/10/14, 15:53

DISCLAIMER

The best sweeteners safe for the body (and present in nature), would be those based on polyol (fructose) and among them xylitol, which would have the distinction of not sending insulin discharge into the body like other sweeteners.

Since quite recently a study on 65 women showed that sweeteners caused more diabetes than people eating "real sugar" ... Because the body not knowing that it is "fake" would still send the order to produce insulin, and as in the end "energy balance side", the body would understand that there are fewer calories, it would then send an order to "eat more" ... And therefore not the expected result!

So xylitol would not present this inconvenience, since identified as an alcohol and not as a sugar (moreover the body knows fructose, so it knows what to do with it).

So it seems that in the state, xylitol is a better choice than stevia (!!! that I supported for a long time, hence this denial) Note the conditional, I will still ask the opinion of our chemist , just to see what he thinks!

As it stands, it is therefore better, when in doubt, to eat real raw cane sugar (or better molasses) than "intense sweeteners"industrial! And even better, simply a fruit or sweeten with a mashed banana or grape juice ...
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491




by Janic » 11/10/14, 20:15

christophe hello
Quote:
We have many natural sugars without looking for these products there.
Ah well which?
as Obamot underlines: that of fruits quite simply! The use of "industrial" sugars is intended to deceive the palate when added to products that are naturally bland or unpleasant to taste.
0 x
User avatar
Cuicui
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3547
Registration: 26/04/05, 10:14
x 6




by Cuicui » 11/10/14, 20:32

Obamot wrote:DISCLAIMER
The best sweeteners safe for the body (and present in nature), would be those based on polyol (fructose) and among them xylitol, which would have the distinction of not sending insulin discharge into the body like other sweeteners.
Glucose-fructose syrup made from transgenic corn and widely used as a sweetener in the United States is believed to cause an increase in pancreatic cancer.
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 11/10/14, 22:58

Is corn a fruit?

As Janic said, this is an industrial product.

From the starch they produce "something" which no longer has anything in common with the natural fructose in fruits. And you had to read better since I spoke well of "intense sweeteners" which corresponds exactly to your example: enzymatic process to increase the concentration of its sweetening power, and which then explodes the recommended daily dose: which is normally between 35 and 50gr / day maximum (of xylitol).

Add to that that in order to "concentrate" it, it must be hydrogenated (industrial process with high temperature and pressure) the catalyst most often used is a metal like nickel .... And we know what this has been worth for them. fats: the hydrogenation of palm oil gives: margarine, "bon appétit" (and hello fatty acids "TRANS")

Besides, I'm even surprised that you talk about an isomer like "glucose"by suggesting a parallel with what I was saying, since it is quite the opposite = dazzling caloric shoot and insulin overdose guaranteed behind (whereas on the contrary the interest of fructuse is its assimilation among the slowest compared to sugars fast and other intense sweeteners).
0 x
User avatar
Cuicui
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3547
Registration: 26/04/05, 10:14
x 6




by Cuicui » 12/10/14, 10:12

Obamot wrote:From the starch they produce "something" which no longer has anything in common with the natural fructose in fruits.
Long live Stevia!
0 x

Back to "Sustainable consumption: responsible consumption, diet tips and tricks"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 120 guests