I'm not necessarily saying the opposite, except that you have to see that in this file -
"bio" or not
"bio" - what matters above all
in terms of priority it is the "acid / base" imbalance... (which itself is part of a whole in which it is "contained") As such, encouraging / democratizing organic junk food involves the danger of making it above all a "cultural" problem (ie we will at McDonald's with friends ... and especially girlfriends!) who will become
"de facto" nutritional ... then late
a chronic public health problem! In this sense the health authorities are guilty and responsible for not following directives "by omission". Since the problem is known.
In addition, to achieve this goal with
"fast food":
Christophe wrote:I disagree: Quick doesn't cheat anyone because their hamburger is organic ... even if it's organic junk food ... it is (a little) less junk food than non organic...
... still would it be necessary that:
- the
"organic trans fatty acids" are less worse than "
trans fatty acids " (it's not, it's kif-kif) ...
- the bread-meat association is no longer carried out (it is not) ...
- the product has fewer hypertensive effects (ingredients
"bio" or not, if we do not change the amount of salt it will not change anything, it is the amount recognized as excessive which will produce the same bad effect) ...
- same for the effect of cola, fries with overheated fat, ketchup
"bio" or not (it should, although being
"bio" that they are not associated together in the organism, if at all, but it would not be called a "hamburgrer") ...
- the cooking mode changes so as not to always deliver as many toxins ...
- a less large acid imbalance = base is provided by an "organic" product (this cannot be the case) ...
- that there is above all what it lacks: that is to say the nutritional supplements which the hamburger lacks by nature.
—
and last but not least, to enlarge the feature: at the limit that they are no longer sold after 18 p.m. (because in principle you should not eat meat products in the evening ...
"bio" or not...)
In other words:
that "fast food" become of "low food". And for that, the authorities should have the courage to grasp the problem in order to issue rules
"law food". It exists, but the huge financial interests of agribusiness make it all too shy.
The proper reasoning you hold had been commented on by Dr. Kousmine who said in his lectures, that
"if we do not eat organic, it is not very important, since our body is largely equipped to compensate for products containing synthetic products". That was ... 30 years ago! In reality, given the number of new synthetic chemical substances in circulation each year (~ 4000 => 40'000 in just ten years ... and which have poorly known cross-effects), I would rather agree with you:
expose ourselves as little as possible, so don't eat it! (As much as possible, but let's try to make it happen without feeling like we are "deprived", which does not achieve this goal is simple "food psychology"!).
But in this practical case, the fact that a product is
"bio" or not plays only too minor a role for it to become significant, since cooking and the associated products release much more toxins than
* organic virtues * could never eliminate ... Your
"bio-balance" will therefore be negative anyway. and the real "attack" they are on our liver, heart and digestive system, further darkens the picture.
Finally about individual characteristics (ie depending on our own metabolic reactions, which change from one individual to another): it is junk food or it is not ... it can not to be
"a little less bad". If there is bad ... it is junk food, if it is good, it is not. Bar point!
I'm not dogmatic, I try to explain myself with an association of ideas: it's not as if the body of a car is
"a little less dirty" because we would have just cleaned it with distilled water ... This is the engine, even if you put 1l. drain oil
"bio" to compensate for the oil level, you would have clogged your engine as much as with normal, synthetic or semi-synthetic oil (it will always remain drain oil ...). As such, it should be understood that the effect on the body is worse, because each centiliter of saturated fat (and / or "trans" fatty acid) requires as many polyunsaturated fatty acids (of "cis" form) to be eliminated from the body (it is a little as if the added oil had the property of making the piston adhere to the combustion chamber instead of playing a role of lubricant ... One of the main reasons for which those who consume these products become obese).
