We are not at war

philosophical debates and companies.
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79126
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10974

Re: We are not at war




by Christophe » 24/03/20, 01:47

: Cheesy: : Cheesy: : Cheesy:

Isn't it Madame who orders from you? : Cheesy:
1 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: We are not at war




by Janic » 24/03/20, 10:05

It's going to do a job so, I will try to condense even if some points have already been seen elsewhere:
Yes, but this notion of the superior man was first engendered by religions and then endorsed by science which recovered the concept for its benefit. Let us not forget that many scientists believe and that most "captains of industry" are believers too.
This is largely correct!

GuyGadebois »23 / 03 / 20, 22: 05
Theoretical blablabla that reality has swept away with its hands over more than 2000 years. I was talking about the perversion of words, the dogmas also perverted the original messages, if they ever existed. The only religions which consider nature as sacred are the so-called animist religions and certain polytheists.
Still largely true!

Ahmed »23 / 03 / 20, 22: 27
Yes, Guy, but it is essentially a question of chronological stage within a process ... Okay for your remark concerning animist religions and very polytheistic religions ...
Janic, we didn't have to read the same bible ...
There are not 36!
What is catching are the various translations of the original languages ​​up to us and especially the interpretations which are then made according to the successive cultures. Hence the dissensions between them whether they are said to be religious or not!
But we can closely examine these 3 points raised without embarking on comparisons between the point of origin and what it is currently! And from memory this has already been done!

GuyGadebois »24 / 03 / 20, 00: 29
Macro wrote:
Ah shit, I would have been greedy ?????
Not at all, Jews, Muslims and Christians are exclusively vegan.
More seriously:
And finally, "there" or "that" started:
http://djep.hd.free.fr/lareferencebibli ... = 1 & To = 28
Indeed, we can notice these differences in translation which are all linked to different cultures over the centuries and beliefs and unbeliefs precisely.
The unique feature of this book is that, each time, translations of translations have deviated from an initial meaning whose origin is lost in time, but which all have a single source: Hebrew and Aramaic with this specificity that there are no vowels and therefore that each word, each sentence can and must take on special meanings with a whole bunch of nuances that escape our translations and traditions.
Hence the necessity and the usefulness of theology to dissect each word, each sentence, each chapter, etc. so as to derive the initial meaning if possible.
However, not all the deviations that have occurred over time allow this to be done. A bit like a virus that would have caused cultural and spiritual pathologies. So this homecoming becomes all the more difficult! How you cannot regain your health without first getting rid of the virus!

Christophe "24/03/20, 01:20
Well then: submit or dominate the Earth ... suddenly I hope God is proud of us !!
Like a father (or a mother of course) in front of all the nonsense of their children? Are you proud of your children's nonsense?
This explains the silence of the Vatican and religions on the fight against global warming ... but that changes a little ...
Indeed, you must FIRST burn yourself by touching the fire to realize that it makes you boo!
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: We are not at war




by Obamot » 22/11/21, 01:27

E68909BE-A4CE-4531-8A3C-16260F81CE3F.jpeg
E68909BE-A4CE-4531-8A3C-16260F81CE3F.jpeg (161.23 KiB) Viewed 1778 times
1 x
humus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1951
Registration: 20/12/20, 09:55
x 687

Re: We are not at war




by humus » 22/11/21, 08:33

grald wrote:to meditate the beautiful text of Sophie Mainguy, emergency doctor
https://cerveauxnondisponibles.net/2020/03/19/nous-ne-sommes-pas-en-guerre-par-sophie-mainguy-medecin-urgentiste/

WE ARE NOT AT WAR
and don't have to be…
By Sophie Mainguy, emergency doctor.
...

Can be already said in the subject, I have not read everything.

It is a manipulation of Macron to justify his "defense council" where all decisions concerning the covid are under defense secret, in order to be unassailable in court thereafter.
By posing the lie "We are at war" the result passes by itself. : Mrgreen:

Trade war, maybe? : roll:
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Society and Philosophy"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 267 guests