2) Chechnya is NOT one of the 14 republics conceded by the Russians after the fall of the Berlin Wall:
3) The destabilization of Chechnya is due to an external movement, linked to international terrorism. And when we speak of terrorism, we must understand that it is a "new" paradigm (said of "war on terror") created from scratch by the obscure political branches that rule America as a backdrop. Which brings us back to our bellicose responsibility as Westerners.
4) And then what is this kind of diktat, which would make that "we would be the good guys", and that consequently we would have a moral right to say what states that we consider different, would be them in the error and not us? It's still a shame that. Outside these borders, Russia has not been responsible for millions of deaths in recent world history. Yes, you have to stay consistent! [End of edit]
That’s what I’m saying and that’s why I’m consistent.
The figure has gone from 1 to 000 soldiers! Since the birth of this thread.
But for what scale of dangerousness?
Besides, does it exist against a country which has just saved Europe from DAE $ H (almost all political analysts agree that the amerloc's unilateral path was a dead end and even wanted and Machiavellianly programmed? .! That they would have knowingly let develop "the monster" and that it is reported that they would even be completely behind the recruitment at least in Syria and partially elsewhere in the world ...
► View Text
Yes, you have to stay consistent.
Why rally against an ally (Russia who saved Europe from America's clutches)?
And pretend she has rabies when it is "us" (Western clan) who gave the tetanus?
Yes, you have to stay consistent.
Of course with DAE $ H ratiboisé (the Euro ends and no alert, not even a cough ...)
America needs to regain legitimacy ... AND it is the same every time, I ask the question: when will the next snake?
And of course those who lack consistency in this ball, it is those who do not have eyes in front of the holes.