Exnihiloest wrote:Flytox wrote:What emerges from your answers is that each time you "break" the green with amalgamations, abusive generalizations and other gratuitous assertions that you cannot support. Who said on this site that it applies all the "good" ecological principles flawlessly? ...
It's called "resistance". And it is not "free", see all the references that I have provided demonstrating the fable of global warming or the counterproductive effects of green measures. It is well founded. It is a resistance in the face of a real political danger, I would like moderate environmentalists to understand it and stop systematically defending their fundamentalists.
So "resistance" means defending the indefensible with force and perseverance to the point of ridicule?
For "free" it will be interesting to know who pays you and how much always to defend the indefensible and "your" phony theses.
The political danger is that irresponsible people like those in your camp will continue to destroy the biosphere at high speed by trying to make people believe that everything is going very well Madame la Marquise. It is high time to do nothing and let the system do its work.
The problem is that moderate capitalism has not yet been invented and that your fundamentalists are far too close to their profits are legion. It's hard to respect those who hit you every day ....
Exnihiloest wrote:You should look in your camp, where it is the industrialists or the farmers, who are systematically "broken", and those who defend them called rotten, auxiliaries of Monsanto, sold to the oil industry, I happening and worse.
To go faster in the enumeration, name me industrialists or farmers who absolutely did not deserve their opprobrium.
Exnihiloest wrote:You will note that I have never criticized the sloths in their vegetable gardens, they act in accordance with their ideas.
Damn !!!, what to let go ....
Exnihiloest wrote: When I see the environmentalists saying less unscientific bullshit, doing less catastrophism, admitting out of intellectual honesty that the current "system" has advantages which they also enjoy, when I see them stop wanting to order everything, ban everything, tax everything , claiming to be the only ones to have concern for future generations, and when I finally see them getting involved, proposing and not imposing operational and practical solutions, and going green rather than the politics of demolition , I will no longer see them as intolerant doctrinaire, and I will change my tone. I leave you free of yours, I await the reciprocal.
One of your favorite formulas, drool over the green people for free without tangible proof and this with arguments that can be directly turned against those of your camps:
When I see the savage capitalists saying less unscientific bullshit, doing less anesthesia, admitting out of intellectual honesty that the current "system" has drawbacks that they also take advantage of (you're in the same sinking boat), when I will see stop wanting to order everything, allow everything (when it comes to destroying everything), financialise everything, claiming to be the only ones to have the concern for human benefits before future financiers, and when finally I see them put their hands to the dough, to propose and not impose operational and practical solutions so as not to disappear from the biosphere, and to make soft and respectful pragmatic capitalism (a whole program
) rather than the policy of demolishing the biosphere, I will no longer see them as intolerant and toxic doctrinaire, and I will change my tone. I leave you free of yours, I do not expect reciprocal, it's your job to pollute this site.