The sexist campaign of AdopteUnMec! Feminization of our Society?

[sen-no-sen]

Isn't this photo fairer?

[sen-no-sen]

Note for Sen-No-Sen: Prostitution gains are already embedded in GDP.

In France it seems to me that this is not yet the case, but for how long?

UNDERGROUND ECONOMY - European countries must now account for illegal activities in their GDP. Paris accepts the principle for drugs but not for prostitution.

The info. Since September 1, European Union member states are supposed to take the underground economy into account when calculating their Gross Domestic Product (GDP). So count the moonlighting, but also and above all the wealth generated by drug trafficking and prostitution. INSEE therefore had to send these new accounts to Brussels by 22 September at the latest. Except that the French institute was reluctant to respect these new standards of the European system of accounts: agree for drugs, but not for prostitutes.

http://www.europe1.fr/economie/la-france-veut-bien-de-la-drogue-mais-pas-des-prostituees-dans-son-pib-2244199

[Christophe]

I would like to know how drugs and prostitution are valued in the calculation of the GDP ... because neither the dealers nor the macros make assessments ...

[Christophe]

The second point of the speech is that if the salary is the same in a strictly equal position, but the average salary of women is lower, it is because society influences the career of women for women. to prevent progress (whether by hierarchy, work stoppages, the choice to work part-time or the conditioning of women so as not to dare to ask for a promotion).

We agree!! Phew !!

Nevertheless, I think that most people still think that in strictly equal positions women are paid less ... We will thank the propaganda work of feminist associations ...

So we have to change society to reach the same average. QED

How to evolve? From above (women have to work more) or from below (men have to work less)?

[Christophe]

Isn't this photo fairer?

Certainly but it's HS

[Ahmed]

Yes, Sen-No-Sen, I had confused with taxation ...

Christophe, you ask yourself:

I would like to know how drugs and prostitution are valued in the calculation of the GDP ... because neither the dealers nor the mackerels make assessments ...

I guess you just have to weight the lump sum estimates ... The statistics are there for that.

Note: prostitution is a broader phenomenon than that of pimps ...

[sen-no-sen]

I would like to know how drugs and prostitution are valued in the calculation of the GDP ... because neither the dealers nor the macros make assessments ...

It's simple, it's all the money that goes into the coffers and that has not been declared!
By close it is a question of approximation, it is indeed very complex to know what exact quantity of drug enters the territory ...

[Christophe]

Uh in what cases ???

I don't know any dealers who pay taxes ...

[sen-no-sen]

Uh in what cases ???

I don't know any dealers who pay taxes ...

I am not talking about tax declarations but economic exchange in general, if we know for example that the automobile activity generates x billion of income and that agriculture brings x billion in addition, when the sum of activities is calculated, we then realize that there is additional income ... which logically emanates from underground activity, statistical studies then provide "fishy" answers on the quantity of illegal income in circulation.

[Ahmed]

... it is indeed very complex to know what exact quantity of drugs enters the territory ...

Indeed, based on the quantities of drug seized, it is not possible to extrapolate the "functional" quantity, knowing that there is a relationship between the two, but that it is a complex function ... this, also knowing that it is necessary for the proper functioning * of "business" that its ban be maintained and that competition be contained => drug seizures.

* Price maintenance.

Christophe, you write:

Uh in what cases ???

I don't know any dealers who pay taxes ...

No need to know what comes in, just count what comes out (even if it's a bit approximate).