Ah finally! But as usual for a boastful it will be nothing!no, I am not asserting anything without being able to provide at least references, even calculations and figures.
Strategy for manipulating the population and opinion in 10 rules
Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79304
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11037
Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules
aerialcastor wrote:No need for youtube video and popular support.
In times of war ... maybe all methods are good to take, right?
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 865
- Registration: 10/05/09, 16:39
- x 21
Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules
No, I don't think that being the barker gets things done at the collective level.
On the other hand, on a personal level, he did well. He has an army of fans, by definition insensitive to rationality, ready to follow him body and soul.
Fanatics, like all fanatics, will not accept any arguments because they are emotional. Jackpot guaranteed for the future. Books, interviews and T-shirt with his effigy, all on a song in his tribute.
On the other hand, on a personal level, he did well. He has an army of fans, by definition insensitive to rationality, ready to follow him body and soul.
Fanatics, like all fanatics, will not accept any arguments because they are emotional. Jackpot guaranteed for the future. Books, interviews and T-shirt with his effigy, all on a song in his tribute.
0 x
Save a tree, eat a beaver.
It is no use to succeed in life, what it takes is to miss his death.
It is no use to succeed in life, what it takes is to miss his death.
- Exnihiloest
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5365
- Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
- x 660
Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules
aerialcastor wrote:Of course it was worth it. If people adhere to his protocol it is thanks to his youtube videos. And not the studies he published and which were very badly received by other specialists in the field (who have the same type of CV as him)
The same goes for the belief in apocalyptic anthropogenic global warming, people believe what people supposed to be competent tell them.
The question is only to have oneself a minimum of skills to know on whom to rely when one does not have them in the technical field in question.
Relying on a practitioner in the field who not only has experience but has also published internationally long before the COVID media coverage seems to me to be quite consistent.
For my part, I read his studies.
He was very well known to specialists. If her studies on Chloroquine had the same rigor as what produced it during the rest of her career, she would have convinced specialists. No need for youtube video and popular support.
We do not have more, and even less, for the announcement of a treatment by the Pasteur Institute in Lille. And either we have less or we have more but it is a fraud, with the studies concerning remsidivir but it is funny, I did not see the same aggressiveness against the Pasteur Institute and Gilead as I did. I saw against Raoult, before it was shown that it was crap. For my part, I conclude that it is the consequence of a lack of critical thinking linked to a posture of beni-oui-oui, whose only references remain the arguments of authority.
aerialcastor wrote:No, I don't think that being the barker gets things done at the collective level.
On the other hand, on a personal level, he did well. He has an army of fans ...
Motivation assumed by way of reason: fallacy (therefore false reasoning).
0 x
Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules
Yet that's what you do all the time!For my part, I conclude that it is the consequence of a lack of critical thinking linked to a posture of beni-oui-oui, whose only references remain the arguments of authority.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
- Exnihiloest
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5365
- Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
- x 660
Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules
It is the expression of vindictive stupidity.Janic wrote:Yet that's what you do all the time!For my part, I conclude that it is the consequence of a lack of critical thinking linked to a posture of beni-oui-oui, whose only references remain the arguments of authority.
The simple fact that I am labeled "climate skeptic" proves the opposite.
But you've never been close to an inconsistency!
0 x
Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules
That's what I'm saying, it's vindictive stupidity that you are showing!It is the expression of vindictive stupidity.Janic wrote:
For my part, I conclude that it is the consequence of a lack of critical thinking linked to a posture of beni-oui-oui, whose only references remain the arguments of authority.Yet that's what you do all the time!
one can very well be anti-conformist on some aspects and very conformist on othersThe simple fact that I am labeled "climate skeptic" proves the opposite.
that way I feel less alone!But you've never been close to an inconsistency!
but I remind you that the sentence quoted, at the head, is not mine, but yours: unless you deny it finally!
However, I completely agree with your formulation above, the only outstanding question is: what is an argument of authority according to you? Give a simple and concrete example!
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
- Exnihiloest
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5365
- Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
- x 660
Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules
Janic wrote:That's what I'm saying, it's vindictive stupidity that you are showing!It is the expression of vindictive stupidity.Janic wrote:
For my part, I conclude that it is the consequence of a lack of critical thinking linked to a posture of beni-oui-oui, whose only references remain the arguments of authority.
Ah he has a layer of it. Vindictive stupidity is calling a climate skeptic a yes-yes subject to the argument of authority, and that's what you did! There are still limits to the improbability, but not with you.
one can very well be anti-conformist on some aspects and very conformist on others
It's called intelligence, individual choice, critical thinking, exercising your free will, your responsibility, your ability to select, qualities that you have never seen. Some official theses are correct, others are not.
Intelligence is no more in the systematic nonconformist like you than in the conformist. The first is only a conformist to obscurantism or to conspiracy theories. He has no thought. Intelligence is in the ability to distinguish, as expressed by Henri Poincaré whom I have often quoted but you do not learn anything.
what is an authority argument according to you? Give a simple and concrete example!
The final and final conclusions of the IPCC reports.
0 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79304
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11037
Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules
The importance of the photographic point of view ... in 1 image ... 2 sorry ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
Re: Handling Strategy (peoples) in 10 rules
And what do you see in this picture?
A CRS with a baton?
It was a test!
In fact, young people will see more of a young girl looking back, while old people will see an old lady looking to the left. On this simple example, we see how easy it is to manipulate the brain's perception of facts.
A CRS with a baton?
It was a test!
In fact, young people will see more of a young girl looking back, while old people will see an old lady looking to the left. On this simple example, we see how easy it is to manipulate the brain's perception of facts.
1 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 15 Replies
- 14376 views
-
Last message by Ahmed
View the latest post
10/12/11, 19:11A subject posted in the forum : Company and Philosophy
-
- 26 Replies
- 35530 views
-
Last message by Christophe
View the latest post
13/04/20, 20:41A subject posted in the forum : Company and Philosophy
-
- 0 Replies
- 3677 views
-
Last message by recyclinage
View the latest post
11/01/10, 19:40A subject posted in the forum : Company and Philosophy
Back to "Society and Philosophy"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 236 guests