Population decline in China

philosophical debates and companies.
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9774
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: Population decline in China




by sicetaitsimple » 19/01/23, 18:38

Ahmed wrote:Of course, demography evolves naturally (notwithstanding external circumstances) according to the two factors of births (mentioned at the beginning of this thread) and deaths. This last factor must logically weigh more and more heavily in countries where the age pyramid is currently widening upwards, particularly in China. If the "candle burns" at both ends, the process will be accelerated, while retaining the inertia specific to these phenomena.

That "the candle burns at both ends" is certainly a more pronounced risk in China than elsewhere. Indeed the one-child policy was implemented in 1980, and it was generally "respected" (not really a choice...).
This means that around 40 years later, the number of women of childbearing age (let's say between 20 and 40 years old for simplicity) is minimal and relatively stable. And even if a rebound in the birth rate were looming, the result on the number of women of childbearing age would only be seen in 20 years...
0 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9774
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: Population decline in China




by sicetaitsimple » 19/01/23, 18:42

Exnihiloest wrote: 
The improvement in the standard of living has always lowered the birth rate.

The case of China is nevertheless specific! when you are forbidden to have more than one child, and this for about 40 years, the improvement in the standard of living is at least of the second order!
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Population decline in China




by Exnihiloest » 19/01/23, 18:44

sicetaitsimple wrote:
Exnihiloest wrote: 
The improvement in the standard of living has always lowered the birth rate.

The case of China is nevertheless specific! when you are forbidden to have more than one child, and this for about 40 years, the improvement in the standard of living is at least of the second order!


The coercion didn't work. It's working today, now that their standard of living is much better.
0 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9774
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: Population decline in China




by sicetaitsimple » 19/01/23, 18:56

Exnihiloest wrote:The coercion didn't work. It's working today, now that their standard of living is much better.

She didn't work? Well, look at the bottom of the age pyramid.

China_sex_by_age_20201101.png
China_sex_by_age_20201101.png (22.11 KiB) Viewed 588 times
0 x
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12298
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2963

Re: Population decline in China




by Ahmed » 19/01/23, 19:07

Yes, instead of writing "particularly the case of China", I should have specified "particularly the case of China".
Overall, the effects of this one-child policy worked, but in fact, the technologisation of society generally* results in a decrease in fertility. We can easily explain this with charming classic arguments, but the main thing, to put it quickly, remains that children represent a resource** in countries that are not technologically advanced and a cost in others...

* The USA is a special case, since the family (and the large family!) still holds a large place there. Religion and the persistence of the settler colonization mission certainly have a lot to do with it.
** With the exception of extreme environments, with scarce resources.
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Population decline in China




by Obamot » 19/01/23, 19:17

I don't believe it, would there be some here who would be justifying the genocidal policy pre and post covid - which obviously comes from the P4 lab in Wuhan, and which it is increasingly obvious that ( deliberately or not) the "virus + vax" cocktail has produced a drop in the birth rate observed in many countries - As an alibi for a kind of 'forced demographic regulation' while having denied the evidence during the facts, and currently without being concretely interested in the penal consequences of method/s worthy of the Nazis*!?!?!?! : Evil: LOOK AT YOURSELF IN A MIRROR, ARE YOU NOT THE RESULTANT OF THIS KIND OF "PERVERSE AND REPRESSED SOCIOPATHY" COMPONENT WHICH HAS LEADED US TOWARDS WHAT IS HAPPEN TO THE WORLD :?:

(*) Multiple violations of the Nuremberg Code... : Shock:
Last edited by Obamot the 19 / 01 / 23, 19: 31, 4 edited once.
1 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9774
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: Population decline in China




by sicetaitsimple » 19/01/23, 19:26

Obamot wrote:I don't believe it, would there be some here who would be justifying the genocidal policy pre and post covid - which obviously comes from the P4 lab in Wuhan, and which it is increasingly obvious that ( deliberately or not) the "virus+vax" cocktail has produced a decline in the birth rate observed in many countries - while having denied the evidence during the facts, and currently without being concretely interested in the penal consequences of method/s worthy of the Nazis*! ?!?!?! : Evil:

(*) Multiple violations of the Nuremberg Code... : Shock:


Does anyone have an intelligible Obamot--> French translator? Thanks in advance.
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Population decline in China




by Obamot » 19/01/23, 19:36

Pretend not to understand, and read again, you omitted a sentence in your quote AND ESPECIALLY REREAD THE POSTS OF OTHER AUTHORS which precede, I will leave you with the benefit of the doubt but useless to ostrich, I will not draw you a picture!
: Evil: : Idea: : Evil: it is shameful!

Gégyx the intuitive was well inspired when he started his post more than a year ago: society-and-philosophy / genocide-in-sight-and-depopulation-program-t16997.html
0 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9774
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: Population decline in China




by sicetaitsimple » 19/01/23, 19:44

Obamot wrote: you omitted a sentence in your quote


I haven't omitted anything, my post dates from 19:26 p.m. while you edited yours 4 times, the last of which was at 19:31 p.m.
If you don't have clear ideas and you need 4* successive versions to express your thoughts, it's still not my fault....

*Last edited by Obamot on 19/01/23, 19:31 p.m., edited 4 times.
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Population decline in China




by Obamot » 19/01/23, 20:01

That's it, quibble over the form to avoid the substance. What you quoted was enough to understand the bottom of my thought. The aspect of the question "of a planetary criminal action to try to correct the world demographic curve"remains hotly topical, a large number of potential Machiavellians should not have been informed of it, and if so (and it becomes clearer every day a little more) the deception would be colossal in scale. it is perhaps it's time to have the courage to face the facts that are already currently known.

Without forgetting that China was at the front of the wave (after the first variant having received the GOF / s to deliberately infect the human species) it therefore had to undergo a particularly formidable virus, which almost crucified victims suffering from predispositions on the field. in pain and after strange characteristic tremors... (See the examples filmed at the time by surveillance cameras / CCTV) no one is therefore surprised by a peak in mortality there, although the numbers should be scrutinized 100x
Last edited by Obamot the 19 / 01 / 23, 20: 05, 1 edited once.
0 x

Back to "Society and Philosophy"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 235 guests