grald wrote:Exnihiloest I don't know you but you seem to me to be a beautiful beast, besides the fact that you take me for an idiot which I appreciate moderately on the part of guy like you, you have the art of confusing the cards and bias the subjects. I hope you are well rewarded for your defense of your poor multinational. No need to discuss with rhetoric specialists (manipe?) And as you did not answer my sf questions with generalist banalities made in wiki, it would be nice to forget me and go elsewhere.
I don't know what's wrong with you. I did not take you for an idiot seen that I did not even look who had launched this thread, because for my part I do not discuss people but only the subject posted. You throw a thread, I answer it, it's the principle of forum and public threads.
If you do not accept the objections, if you do not understand the answers because I nevertheless answered your question "Are there any legal tricks" (yes, the patentability criteria not respected which make it possible to break a patent, and it is common), and that you see it as "muddling the waters and skewing the subjects", it is your problem not mine. It would be nice to try to read more carefully and try to understand.