Christophe wrote:I always go further!
Farther than where?
Christophe wrote:I always go further!
phil59 wrote:We arrive in an absurd world ...
GuyGadebois wrote:phil59 wrote:We arrive in an absurd world ...
How does "we arrive" ??? We have been there for 40 years Obamot ....
phil59 wrote:GuyGadebois wrote:phil59 wrote:We arrive in an absurd world ...
How does "we arrive" ??? We have been there for 40 years Obamot ....
No agreement, it's been racing there for a short time ...
To desire a black woman is racism!
We didn't know. It is a whole site devoted to anti-racism that teaches us.
I There are some who, sensitive to their graceful beauty, love Japanese and Chinese women. There are some who fantasize about Russians with endless legs. There are some who pinch some for Scandinavian girls. Even that we know of some, totally devoid of imagination, who only have eyes for Bretons and Normans.
It is a matter of taste and in the cases mentioned above, it poses no problem. But where there is scandal is when white males are very interested in black girls.
The French AJ + site, an offshoot of Aljazeera, warns us: "Desiring a girl because of the color of her skin or her ethnicity is fetishism. That is to say racism."
(...)
"Communitarianisms carry within them brutality without limits"
Grandstand. Éric Delbecque, expert in internal security, castigates our blindness in the face of the rise in daily siltation.
We live in a totally schizophrenic reality. On the one hand, an increasingly heavy ideological climate persists in trying to make us believe that we are potential victims, dominated, walking proofs of some injustice, no matter which one. Obviously, for the oppressed to exist, there must be "bad guys", executioners, oppressors. Activists of all stripes - in the literal sense sometimes, in the permanent figurative sense - thus snip the State, the government and the security forces by uttering outrage when the authorities do their job: maintaining public order , an elementary condition of the democratic system.
On the other, the alarming observation, every day more evident, of a daily poverty. The proof is provided to us, once again, by two dramas tearing apart the banality of ordinary existence. A bus driver in Bayonne, Philippe Monguillot, lost his life because he wanted to uphold the law, because he expressed his choice for responsible citizenship. Shortly before, a young 25-year-old gendarme, Mélanie Lemée, died on a roadblock in Port-Sainte-Marie, fatally killed by a motorist wanting to escape control. Obviously because he was carrying drugs and he was driving without a driver's license. In summary, petty criminals decided in both cases to tread on the laws of the Republic.
(...)
Brutes are brutes, not victims.
Any woman, any man, has the right to challenge, discuss, fight for his convictions or even his interests. On the other hand, as soon as an individual chooses violence to impose himself in the face of decisions born of the vote, as soon as he tries to exempt himself from the minimum standards of life in society, he deserves rigor, rational and not avenging, of the Criminal Code. To refuse this reasoning is not to choose freedom, it is to militate for barbarism.
Back to "Society and Philosophy"
Users browsing this forum : Remundo, sicetaitsimple and 347 guests