Mat Patrimoine, a neologism? Not a word erased among others ...

philosophical debates and companies.
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14931
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4346

Mat Patrimoine, a neologism? Not a word erased among others ...




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 29/01/21, 19:51

"Matrimonial heritage is not a neologism, but a word erased by history"


Researcher and director Aurore Evain. devotes his research to the enhancement of the heritage and creators of the past. She notably directed an anthology of the theater of women of the Ancien Régime and published in 2001 an essay entitled The apparition of professional actresses in Europe with the editions L'Harmattan. She has also conducted extensive research on the history of the female word author. Today, it is trying to develop a production and distribution network that highlights these artists forgotten by the history of live performance. So many issues covered by the notion of heritage, which she defines at the microphone of Marie Sorbier.

"Matrimonial heritage is the heritage and cultural goods of women. It is not a neologism. It is a word that has a political history."
Aurora Evain


In the Middle Ages, when a couple gets married, both the patrimony (the property inherited from the father) and the matrimonial property (the property inherited from the mother) are declared. A few centuries later, only the European Heritage Days and marriage agencies remain ... The substantive matrimonial has faded to subsist only in the form of the matrimonial adjective which relates only to the private sphere of marriage. At the same time, heritage has received its letters of nobility: the term designates the property of the entire nation.

Aurore Evain seeks to show that matrimonial heritage exists, despite beliefs anchored in time and its erasure in the narrative of history. Matrimonial heritage is however a powerful notion which represents the fact that, whatever the contexts of production and creation, women have succeeded in creating, writing, thinking and inventing over the centuries. Author, this is another term that we could think of as new in our vocabulary when in fact it has existed since Antiquity.

"Since Antiquity, we have been waging war on these words," author "and" matefeuille ", which are part of a set of feminine words which have been erased, notably by the French Academy in the 17th century, when politicize language and create cultural institutions, grammar, dictionaries. "
Aurora Evain


The 17th century marked the beginning of the invisibilization of feminine words which expressed the presence and power of women as actors in society. This masculinization of the language took place particularly until the 19th century.

Aurore Evain, who came from the theater as an actress, author and director, works precisely on matheritage within the performing arts, working to give back a place to women artists forgotten by history.

"I did not know that women had written theater before the 20th century and Marguerite Duras. I was interested in the appearance of actresses, central figures in our culture today, and discovered that some had written theater, as early as the 16th century. It is in the registers of the Comédie-Française of this period that I discovered the word author. "
Aurora Evain


A research which consists in naming the contemporary authors of Molière, Corneille and Racine whose work was celebrated and translated in different countries. As a response to the writer Virginia Woolf who said in A Room of Her own that Shakespeare's sister could never have existed. An assertion also refuted by the essays of the American researcher Robin P. William, which suggest that Shakespeare was perhaps an author: Mary Sidney, Countess of Pembroke.

"A whole theatrical heritage must be cleared up. The theater has a special place: our cultural heritage and the prestige of the nation-state were built on Corneille, Molière and Racine. Show that this French literary genius puts aside from great authors like Madame de Villedieu, Catherine Bernard, Antoinette Deshoulières, Marie-Anne Barbier. "
Aurora Evain


These authors offer plays that resonate with our current concerns, because they overturn gender stereotypes: there are strong women, who choose politics over love.

"We are talking about the Cornelian dilemma, but we could talk about the Bernardian dilemma!"
Aurora Evain


With the help of two American researchers, Aurore Evain worked on these pieces to then edit them. In the United States, this research effort was initiated in the 1990s, when students already had access to the theatrical works of 17th century French authors, while most French people were still unaware of their existence.

After finding and editing these pieces, Aurore Evain decided to stage them. Thanks to Yoann Lavabre, the director of the Guyancourt theater, she is putting on The Favorite of Madame de Villedieu, the first cover of the play 350 years after its creation. This play had been performed by Molière and his troupe at Versailles in front of Louis XIV. Later, Yohann Lavable offers Aurore Levain a 4-year creative residency around matrimonial heritage, in order not only to create new shows, but also to create a network for the dissemination and production of matrimony in the field of performing arts, to which joined Stéphane Frimat, from Vivat, stage of Armentières. Carole Thibaut, the director of the CDN of Montluçon, also participated in the company by scheduling each year in her establishment of the Journées du matefeuille.

"It is about avoiding having 30 Bourgeois gentilhomme in one season, and having a little Catherine Bernard, by Marie-Anne Barbier, in order to open up our imaginary theaters."
Aurora Evain


To discover the work of these many authors, visit the Edifier notre matefeuille website.

https://www.franceculture.fr/emissions/ ... nvier-2021
1 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: Matefeuille, a neologism? Not a word erased among others ...




by ABC2019 » 29/01/21, 19:58

Researcher and director Aurore Evain. devotes his research to the enhancement of the heritage and creators of the past. She notably directed an anthology of the theater of women of the Ancien Régime and published in 2001 an essay entitled The apparition of professional actresses in Europe with the editions L'Harmattan. She has also conducted extensive research on the history of the female word author.

...
"It's a whole theatrical heritage that needs to be cleared up. ...

Aurora Evain



you should know !!! : Mrgreen:
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14931
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4346

Re: Matefeuille, a neologism? Not a word erased among others ...




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 29/01/21, 21:37

For further:
The author's story, of which we offer a quick sketch here, is fascinating in more than one way, because it cuts across both the history of the language, that of the author function and the stages of access to women in the public sphere in general, and in creation in particular. Above all, it makes it possible to put down certain prejudices concerning the supposed incongruity of this feminine and its inability to designate the woman who writes. The development of glossaries, the increasing digitization of ancient texts and the cross-search offers provided by the Internet should make it possible in the future to deepen this history, and to correct or refine this first synthesis.

http://siefar.org/wp-content/uploads/20 ... -Evain.pdf
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14931
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4346

Re: Matefeuille, a neologism? Not a word erased among others ...




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 30/01/21, 19:49

Echoing "Adopt a guy. Feminization of our society".
No, there is no feminization of our society, rather a tendency to catch up with what has always been an almost exclusive control of men over it.
0 x
User avatar
sen-no-sen
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6856
Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
Location: High Beaujolais.
x 749

Re: Matefeuille, a neologism? Not a word erased among others ...




by sen-no-sen » 31/01/21, 10:19

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:Echoing "Adopt a guy. Feminization of our society".
No, there is no feminization of our society, rather a tendency to catch up with what has always been an almost exclusive control of men over it.


The domination of men over women in societies (nearly 90% of human societies are essentially patriarchal) is a consequence of technology.
The masculine functions, more turned towards the confrontation and the predation * one largely favored the men, relegating the women to the tasks of reproduction and management of the household.
However with the emergence of techno-industry and the automation of the means of production, tasks formerly attributed to men are now given to women and more and more.
There is therefore no objectively feminization of society, but rather an "androgynization" (sorry for the neologism) of humans, which is reflected in particular by an inclusive LGBTQ-type policy.
Let feminists not be reassured, this kind of policy only serves them ...


* This does not mean that women could not have been excellent warriors, however the low survival rate of infants and long gestations in our species have resulted in women being sidelined. .
1 x
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12307
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2968

Re: Matefeuille, a neologism? Not a word erased among others ...




by Ahmed » 31/01/21, 16:49

I quite agree with your analysis overall, Sen-no-sen, what appeals to me is this: totalizing economism implied the eradication of memes (it is a nod to Guy !) which emerged from previous systems of domination. However, the patriarchy is curiously an exception, which should legitimately question. I obviously cannot develop such a complex question, but it is clear that firstly, the duality does not exactly cover the difference between male and female gender, but rather roles in so-called "modern" society. This points to a rather different explanation of the banal patriarchy. Apart from the fact that from the birth of production societies, the physical advantages of men qualified them particularly for these new tasks (just as before for war, as you have pointed out) which was a war against nature. However, the accumulation of abstract value (hello, there it is again!) Could not have lasted without a part of human energy (too human!) Being devoted to its maintenance and reproduction; it was the tribute to pay for the imperfection of our biology evaluated in the light of the machine-world and the mechanical man of Descartes was not up to its "manifest destiny", or rather that assigned to it by the worshipers of "progress" in the person of their devoted zealots, themselves unconsciously subject to determinism. This limitation had to be minimized as much as possible so as not to make the process of accumulation of value disastrous, hence the contempt for female or assimilated spaces and the measures taken to guarantee their status quo. This explains many current aspects, such as, for example, the feminization of professions which have lost their prestige (teaching, for example) or the chronic under-equipment of hospitals. Conversely, from the moment a woman corresponds to the masculine sphere, this glass ceiling which does not exactly reflect the root of the problem ceases to be of any relevance.
It would therefore be high time to revisit these questions at new expense, under penalty of getting bogged down in sterile debates on the rights of minorities, whether these micro societies fall under gender or other qualifiers.
1 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14931
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4346

Re: Matefeuille, a neologism? Not a word erased among others ...




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 31/01/21, 17:26

Ahmed wrote:... this glass ceiling which does not exactly reflect the background ...

I love ! You are on the ground ... : Cheesy:
0 x
User avatar
sen-no-sen
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6856
Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
Location: High Beaujolais.
x 749

Re: Matefeuille, a neologism? Not a word erased among others ...




by sen-no-sen » 31/01/21, 18:02

Ahmed you write
This explains many current aspects, such as, for example, the feminization of professions which have lost their prestige (teaching, for example) or the chronic under-equipment of hospitals. Conversely, from the moment a woman corresponds to the male sphere, this glass ceiling which does not exactly reflect the root of the problem ceases to be all relevant.


Yes and we had already talked about it. : Wink:
The reason is significantly linked to the attribute of the masculine and feminine gender in history. The world of men is more linked to predation (hunting, war, etc.). The economy being just another means to wage war, we logically find more men in sectors quick to increase energy dissipation.
The current problem is the following: there is no feminization of society at all (masculinist observation bias), but on the contrary a masculinization of women, a sacred nuance. In other words, the transformation of women into economic agents as well. dangerous than men.



NB: It is necessary to define the terms to avoid any misunderstanding.
The notion of patriarchy corresponds to a type of family structure articulated around a patriarch (that is to say a dominant male), generally a chief of a clan or of a tribe who is often polygamous.
This notion of patriarch finds an echo in particular in the Old Testament.
At the present time and a fortiori in socio-democracies, the patriarchy has disappeared, replaced most often by the single-parent structure.
Patriarchy in the world is on the way outThe term patriarchal capitalism proclaimed by some therefore has no meaning, because it is the economic system that guarantees such a state of affairs.
0 x
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12307
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2968

Re: Matefeuille, a neologism? Not a word erased among others ...




by Ahmed » 31/01/21, 18:52

To my regret, we fully agree! : Oops:
The masculinization of which you speak results from the fact that the recruitment of the best agents of energy dissipation implies no longer taking gender into account, just as was the case with racism, very practical in the phase of initial capital accumulation, but against then productive with regard to the level of production. The selection no longer operates in such a way that the maximum number of agents participate in the creation of abstract value, since the computer revolution no longer allows it, but by excluding the "useless" and overvaluing the most efficient agents. If necessary by combing categories ignored until now, such as LGBT or the like ... A new duality is more or less in place, I issue this last restriction insofar as the process is perfectly unstable and of last resort since it is hard to see these expedients long-term remedying the structural flaws in the system.

Personal PS: I still have small problems with my messaging, so I'm waiting for it to work again ...
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14931
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4346

Re: Matefeuille, a neologism? Not a word erased among others ...




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 31/01/21, 18:55

0 x

Back to "Society and Philosophy"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 367 guests