humus wrote:Exnihiloest wrote:You claim to understand that others have not understood you, when you obviously do not understand the answers!
The fact that nature is not only competition, it is scientifically perfectly recognized, in no way demonstrates that we should venerate it.
Well, it's a bit like ABC, "false banner attack".
Where did you see me talking about worshiping anything?
Being grateful to nature, your body, I assure you it will do you good, and us with it.
I don't practice this recognition enough but I have done it before, so I can talk about it.Exnihiloest wrote:If competition seems to be the general rule, we also occasionally see collaborations that work, occurring among the multitude of operations linked to the method of attempts/success/failures, and which are chosen for their success. It does not make it the result of a conscience that would have made this choice according to moral criteria, unlike man whose societies have always presented forms of solidarity, and even forms of institutionalized solidarity.
Human beings are supposed to have an advantage over all living things a conscience and the RESPONSIBILITY that results from it.
Perhaps the human being can, and MUST, be more intelligent than the primal nature, because of this power, because of this responsibility?
Your speech does not take off from the instincts / primary rules of nature.
Long live the planet of the apes who think they are scholars! Is that all you have to offer? Copy nature in what is most primary?
Not a lot of ambition...for a cador
uh but just above you said that nature was a model to be followed and you used a vocabulary that seemed to endow nature with consciousness...
well, no one denies that there are natural phenomena where living beings cooperate and others where they compete, both in humans and in the rest of life. I don't really see what to do with this observation. Man is obviously also in cooperation in many structures, family, circle of friends; company, nation, which does not prevent it from being also in competition by other with dimensions; it obviously has no risk or chance of changing; To believe that you are going to revolutionize the world by enacting a general principle that everyone should follow seems very naive to me...