But is it not via the artifice of
anthropocentrism and of his own deceptions that “
human communities” are guided in deterministic systems and cross the threshold of transgression towards its different vectors? Afterwards, we can always establish a sort of chronological test between them, but they can be mixed up because there is not necessarily any hermeticity between the beliefs:
Thus certain fictions, certain “deterministic systems“, can cohabit with others! By way of example (in no particular order):
— the original “sin” (transcribed in the sense of “consumption”, Janic will complain ^_^ ...apologies);
— sects (do not complain)
— politics that tends towards indoctrination (and not liberation through collective effort);
— the ruse of thermodynamics (as you express it? Or the individual faced with a fait accompli...?);
— the recurring question of “
job” (I mean subject to consumption... men have not always 'worked';
— supply VS demand;
— the continuation of the money VS debt paradigm (money creation and all that revolves around it);
— the connection between the “market” and a pseudo “New World Order”);
— xenophobia, even and especially going back to slavery(*) which only offers a single reading of “reality”... (and brings us back to fictitious values and eventually brings us back to the whole?) .
The fictitious values that make humans become “
objects in material and temporal shift”, lead us to understand the constraints linked to the plunder of energy resources, which escape us but which betray a part of this anthropocentric behavior, just as with the contempt for the world of those who are the object of it and with whom they interact without understand finitude.
In short, the transgression seems to have become a kind of “
dictatorship of the norm** through which determinism is expressed (governments appeal to McKinsey and then tell us “
that there is no other way to reform”) ...and that which directs the ball, is a factory of impostures!*** Which makes us slaves.
________________________________
* (In the fictional novel
“Beloved” by T. Morrison, everything is thought-provoking, bordering on the extremes, since the character of the Novel ends up choosing the absolute end of killing his kids... I say that because the constraints of the system must manage to push a lot of them to such extremes, though no end is final... the prevailing determinism is powerful!)
All this context, leads to see the nightmare of slavery from the inside, as sometimes in 'the gears of the economy'.
** I quote Roland Gori
***I quote Roland Gori again
(occupational hazard)