Evolution of thought systems, myths and beliefs in history.

[Janic]

humus

Considering your words, I am not sure that you are even to judge my words and Janic do not speak about it.

being targeted, on the contrary let's talk about it! What is bothering you? That we do not share YOUR point of view on certain points or that we demonstrate that it has no real value?

[Obamot]

Yes it's crazy your denial and your blindness, it's you who judges my words as "better"

No, not a judgment, a way of speaking in front of your problem of cognition. You delay. Are we talking about your fallacies? You want?

And because you use words you don't know the meaning of, then make your interlocutors look like imbeciles by making fun of yourself! You're not an idiot so why would you need this to make yourself feel better? .... as you have just done again, and that this behavior, well we know it here, even if you have possibly changed your nickname several times, as Janic says. (And you talk about denial ah-ah) We can no longer count your derogatory remarks, and the pungency is that you accuse others of your own faults, you have to call a spade a spade.

you're not always like that, still happy. Corn there I no longer want to answer you because you're going to ramble on like a little old man again

[Janic]

obamot

because you're going to ramble on like a little old man again

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh, don't touch the old ... unvaccinated

[humus]

humus

Considering your words, I am not sure that you are even to judge my words and Janic do not speak about it.

being targeted, on the contrary let's talk about it! What is bothering you? That we do not share YOUR point of view on certain points or that we demonstrate that it has no real value?

I am aiming at you because Obamot I pose as a defender of your attitudes: inattention, incomprehension of the words of the other and going into a spin on your part following all that.
As for the substance, without going into detail, I do not perceive that you really understand what I am talking about, too attached to religion, in short, it does not follow from the source ...
What I am evoking is not a point of view, it would rather be a liberation from the commonly shared logic of the point of view.
I know, I understand and practice (I try to heal myself ) operation in point of view.
Any point of view is fundamentally wrong.
This is precisely the fundamental problem, the point.
Any action of the individual is done to protect this point which is illusory and corrupt. The resulting vision is not objective, it is illusory and corrupt.
Everything lies in letting go of the point that sees.
This is the point that is limited; I am limited.

[humus]

Are we talking about your fallacies? You want?

You haven't always mentioned any to me.

[Obamot]

Here is one

humus

Considering your words, I am not sure that you are even to judge my words and Janic do not speak about it.

being targeted, on the contrary let's talk about it! What is bothering you? That we do not share YOUR point of view on certain points or that we demonstrate that it has no real value?

I'm aiming at you because Obamot I pose as a defender of your attitudes

And you do not care since you also cut short the explanation on the "rhetorical figures" claiming that you had made a joke

Well I'm stopping there for this weekend, because it's starting to pile up, take a step back ... Hum

[humus]

Here is one

humus being targeted, on the contrary let's talk about it! What is bothering you? That we do not share YOUR point of view on certain points or that we demonstrate that it has no real value?

I'm aiming at you because Obamot I pose as a defender of your attitudes

And you do not care since you also cut short the explanation on the "rhetorical figures" claiming that you had made a joke

Well I'm stopping there for this weekend, because it's starting to pile up, take a step back ... Hum

In what and where it is a fallacy, explains.
It's the substance that interests me, not the form.
Looks like you're mixing up my whole bunny, the 'gag' the other day has nothing to do with the situation you're quoting.

Always judgment without evidence ...

PS: I don't like idiots, maybe that's the problem, basically, I'm going to work on it

[Janic]

humus

I am aiming at you because Obamot I pose as a defender of your attitudes: inattention, incomprehension of the words of the other and going into a spin on your part following all that.

mirror effect, you take your reflection for reference in all things, true or not!

As for the substance, without going into detail, I do not perceive that you really understand what I am talking about,

.That's for sure, cat porridge is not very clear!

too attached to religion,

typical example of your ignorance and stupidity.
I have widely expressed several times that religions, even atheists, are means of expression
which are worth what each one wants to grant them, they are not references. It is therefore as if I were saying "you are too attached to your atheistic religion". are you?

What I am evoking is not a point of view, it would rather be a liberation from the commonly shared logic of the point of view.
I know, I understand and practice (I try to heal myself ) operation in point of view.
Any point of view is fundamentally wrong.
This is precisely the fundamental problem, the point.
Any action of the individual is done to protect this point which is illusory and corrupt. The resulting vision is not objective, it is illusory and corrupt.
Everything lies in letting go of the point that sees.
This is the point that is limited; I am limited.

that's it, cat porridge, which has already been reported to you by several, as for your similar (or you former Eclectron)

PS: I don't like idiots, maybe that's the problem, basically, I'm going to work on it

then you must hate yourself! It's rare among narcissists.

[humus]

PS: I don't like idiots, maybe that's the problem, basically, I'm going to work on it

then you must hate yourself! It's rare among narcissists.

Ah !, finally a level answer!
Indeed, I do not esteem myself enough for what I should deserve.
Maybe my side Franck Dubosc annoys.
Can I serve you some Jean Claude Convenant, do you want some?


Well, if not always zero answer on the merits of what would interest me
The net is often disappointing.

The famous porridge for cats is only a sign of your both inability to understand and to overcome your egoic mode of functioning. I admit, it's not easy, you still have to be curious about that.
I repeat, we can discuss everything but not with just anyone.

We still do not know where and why I sophise in circles?
I'm used to spurious or empty claims from swaggers on the internet

We can discuss everything but not with just anyone and above all no matter where.

This is the lesson I take from this episode.
and then tolerate the difference ...

Yours, and sorry if I could be hurtful, I'm in transition to ... mystery.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

humus

Considering your words, I am not sure that you are even to judge my words and Janic do not speak about it.

being targeted, on the contrary let's talk about it! What is bothering you? That we do not share YOUR point of view on certain points or that we demonstrate that it has no real value?

What did you demonstrate, when and where? I saw nothing, sorry.