sen-no-sen wrote:
Very just!
Charlie Hebdo represented "freedom of expression of power", that is to say that allowed within the limits of what the politically correct can support, all wrapped in a very liberal-libertarian tendency inherited from "68".
Their propensities to ridicule religious currents, a fortiori Islam was not trivial, and the attack they suffered was not either ...
The repeated provocations, legitimate in themselves, but little indicated in the current context, aimed "maybe" (I'm nice!) To invoke unconsciously an agression.
There is therefore no plot behind this affair, but rather a strange phenomenon of societal psychology.
"We can laugh at everything, but not with everyone" Desproges
I think that you are going a little quickly in delay: do not forget the incessant trials made by the "system", of which only the last ones concerned the religious question; Almost everything was spent there: censorship (De Gaulle), questioning of the army, etc etc etc ...
It is true that there are two Charlie's: that of Professor Choron and Co and that of the Rescutie; some of the cartoonists / columnists were the same, but I think the "editorial line" has changed a bit.
The social debates too !!!!!
It is finally true that seeing people queuing at 5 am (I have not seen, but heard on France Info) has a side "exit from Harry Potter" or "Iphone5" which would perhaps have revolted the fire. Charlie designers themselves!
So you have to see that we now probably have a 3rd Charlie, so the Charlie 2 would have made fun of and against which the pofessor Choron might have taken out his cock to piss on it, a glass of champagne in his hand, or even for throw up on it ????