pedrodelavega wrote:Obamot wrote:The majority of English-language newspapers have spoken of "DEFIANCEFor the issue of "Charlie Hebdo" which has just been released. Aren't they right to have detected it this way ?! For my part I consider the adjective correct, it is even far below the joint irresponsibility of a government which defends "its press", against a background of editorial slant* indefensible!
* if this term still makes sense in this case ...! Lamentable mess.
Some caricatures of the different prophets, it's not the end of the world either ....
If you had read my posts with kindness, you would have understood what I meant, which does not correspond at all with what you want it to be assumed that I did not say (whether intentionally or not, besides, I'm not accusing, but frankly, the "pseudo-BIS" you use in double identity, reminds me of someone now.)
pedrodelavega wrote:Obamot wrote:But the instrumentalization of that, while we do not even know if the attackers of "Charlie Hebdo" are indeed the same who were then liquidated Dammartin (we suppose).
Who supposes? There is no assumption on this side there.
that facts.
Idem, I am just as convinced as it is them, but that is not the purpose of my remarks. Because of having eliminated them all, did democracy feel grown, where should we eliminate them to make an example !?
Curiously 2 days after having liquidated them, there was no longer any danger, nearly 4mios of citizens could parade without being threatened! For a political-social system which applies the precautionary principle and which is its initiator: strange no ...?!
Have you seen warnings in the media about what to do in the event of a new attack on parade day? What a denial!
Just as strange the fact that we found Coulibally's identity papers in his hideout (which proves that the attackers did not have them on them, nor had they planned to take them with them), ditto for the shoe that fell from the black Citroën C3 (in the changing mirror color) and which showed that the attackers had planned an outfit to change and therefore that they had absolutely no intention of revealing their identity to the world, but to disappear incognito or with the prospect of perpetrating yet more attacks! And how quickly, to have been convinced that there were no other surviving accomplices (like the girl who we did not yet know that she had already disappeared for Syria, unless. .. There was no danger: what else if it was not that the situation was completely under control and that would only have been possible if ........). So the certainties Mr Pseudo-BIS.
Because how could such risks have been taken with all the gotha of European politics, by exposing it to bursts of kalach, if we had not been completely author, director and why not executing the scenario! (I'm not saying that's what happened, I'm wondering, I'm waiting for the trial! You see, there are a lot of
facts AND IT SHOULD BE TAKEN NOTE OF
FACTS, BUT NOT SELECTIVELY IF YOU WANT TO STAY IMPARTIAL!)
Ditto for the photo of the identity document released to the press, while the color temperature of the camera which took the snapshot could not correspond to that of the "gray overcast" weather of the day in question, as the The identity of the attackers was already known in Israel before we even learned about them in France, and last but not least, tell us, how are you going to be able to prove your point of view, now that they are dead?
I don't want to go (or get sucked into) a bad conspiracy theory by you, since no matter where it comes from, who cares, the goal being to debunk this issue around religious fanaticism (on one side) like the other when it comes to skull & bones ...)
In short, at this stage it is necessary to remove the causes therefore militate for the legitimate creation of a Palestinian state, which will make everything fall like a blast: this permanent need to destabilize the world by previous attacks of the armed operations, justified then as can (unless languages are untied before)!
I don't know, don't you know what's going on? Do you believe everything we tell you? In everything you read? In everything you see on TV? Don't you read opposition newspapers that allow you to base your personal opinion outside the media that have gone to bed before the dictate of the market economy as the only alternative? Do you have at least one personal reflection that you could advance and which you could guarantee to have acquired it yourself objectively and without any external influence? N $ A, the report on torture by the C! Does that mean anything to you? Snøwden have you ever heard of it? Wiki! Eaks either?
You don't have internet, that's it
