too forced on Cognac or other similar products?In short if someone has another hypothesis?
Your observation is not unique, so you are not crazy!
too forced on Cognac or other similar products?In short if someone has another hypothesis?
Janic wrote:Your observation is not unique, so you are not crazy!
Christophe wrote:If some have an explanation for the following observation, now that I think about it I had never talked about it here.
Made in late July 2017 a little before midnight. (I could find the exact date)
a) I watched the sky with my son as I often do
b) We saw what I thought to be a satellite: luminosity of a star with a straight path at constant speed
c) Trajectory almost full south (already not very common but read more)
d) Location: 25 km north of Sedan
e) The object stopped and became a "fixed star" impossible to distinguish it from others
f) The deceleration was done, at arm's length, over a distance of about 3-4 cm in 2 or 3 seconds ...
The most credible explanation (the only one in fact) that I found is the installation of a geostationary satellite but the physical numbers do not stick!
Indeed, at 36000 km instead of 400 km gives a very important speed of the order of 2 km / h or 430 km / s since at 000 km the satellites are at around 675 km / h. (estimate made with a simple triangle and Thales ...)
And above all an even greater slowdown: if we assume that it was done over 3 seconds, this implies a slowdown of (675-3) / 3 = 224 km / s² or 23 G! 3 km / s is the speed of geostationary satellites
In short, impossible! The truth is elsewhere!
In short if someone has another hypothesis?
Exnihiloest wrote:The fact that it stops is also an assumption. If it was a meteorite arriving tangentially enough to the earth so that we have time to see it, and it decays, then a star in the background that we then take for the object can give the printing of a judgment.
The US Navy confirms for the first time the authenticity of videos unveiled in 2017 and filmed by fighter planes: we see light forms moving at high speed. Strictly speaking, UFOs
Exnihiloest wrote:You can't see geostationary satellites with the naked eye.
Back to "Society and Philosophy"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 286 guests