The post-Coronavirus world

[Christophe]

On the search engine I found this doc:

COVID-19: The Great Reset (French Edition)

...but I don't know where it was posted...maybe in this thread above...

[Obamot]

HERE health-pollution-prevention/the-world-after-a-change-in-our-behaviour-is-indispensable-t16478-10.html?hilit=klaus%20schwab#p426107

But you're treating a Billionaires Club above suspicion of “complotistes"

(I report to moderation) ( )

[izentrop]

You are in the process of bringing out the thesis of the "great replacement" dear to Zemmour and which is dividing the political class at the moment https://www.lefigaro.fr/elections/presi ... e-20220215
More information https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/15/worl ... ement.html

[Obamot]

The term “Great replacement” is obviously a misappropriation of the meaning of “Great reset” in order to cover the tracks!

In either case, when the right had the power (there is no “centre-right”, it is the center of the right in any case) it is an admission of failure that it tries to make up for by trying to set the record straight at the most favorable time for the world of finance.

This suitcase phrase means nothing, it's a term as abstract as abstract values ​​(a clumsy nod to Ahmed...)

[Christophe]

There you go…

[Obamot]

They had already tried to do that with the war in the Middle East,
They start again with the EU barely out of the covid crisis — for which they are responsible* — they are ruthless...


*) Until proven otherwise...

[Obamot]

Pass: Big Reveal

[Obamot]

Well, Russians can too bomb Syrian oil wells that the usa has been looting for quite a while.

Putin will always have an alternative in advance.

The film continues:
500 pro-Turkish Syrians (from al nostra) go to ukraine to defend democracy... Who cares?

When it comes to tackling terrorism & neo-Nazis, would the Russians have understood that:
Wouldn't just 'deal' with the Ukrainian question be enough?

Analyzes of the ongoing Russian offensive in Ukraine generally situate it as an extension of the various acts of force perpetrated by the Kremlin in its post-Soviet environment. It is nevertheless possible to broaden the perspective to the Syrian, or even Mediterranean, theatre. It is indeed there that Vladimir Putin took the greatest advantage of the lack of determination of the United States and their European allies, which could only encourage him to adopt a warmongering posture vis-à-vis Kiev. Conversely, nothing prevents us from considering that an escalation of the Ukrainian crisis could now have repercussions in the Mediterranean, as Moscow intends to take advantage of its ability to integrate the two theaters of operation, in the face of Western leaders who are slow to take the measure of this new situation.

FROM DAMASCUS TO CRIMEA
Barack Obama never understood that he had scuttled in Syria a good part of the deterrence of the United States against Russia, because he remained prisoner of a vision distinguishing the "strategic" European theater from a medium- eastern "tactical". His August 2013 pushback, when he refused to implement his own "red lines" after Bashar al-Assad's chemical bombardment of insurgent Damascus suburbs, convinced Putin that Washington would not react seriously to the invasion of Crimea, launched six months later. Once pocketed the annexation of this Ukrainian province, the Kremlin turned to the Syrian theater, this time with a direct intervention, in support of the Assad regime, from September 2015. The Kremlin took advantage of this offensive to expand in Syria its organization in the Eastern Mediterranean, the former maritime establishment of Tartous now being supplemented by an air base near Latakia.

The Russian head of state has also benefited the most from the growing tensions, over Syria, between Turkey and the rest of NATO. While Ankara was long considered the "Southern pillar" of the Atlantic alliance, NATO was careful not to react to the multiple violations of Turkish airspace by Russian aircraft. President Erdogan in vain denounced such "letting go", before deciding to deal directly with Moscow and abandoning the Syrian revolutionaries in December 2016. The partnership thus forged enabled the Kremlin to consolidate Assad's control over two-thirds of Syrian territory, while Turkey seized border enclaves in Syria. The United States and European countries were ostensibly excluded from this new deal, which served as a model, three years later, for another Russian-Turkish "condominium", this time in Libya, again at the expense of Washington and his allies.

FROM EASTERN EUROPE TO THE WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN
The Kremlin has not only undermined Western strategic positions in Syria and Libya to better strengthen its hand in Eastern Europe. It has also trivialized unconventional warfare techniques that have demonstrated their harmfulness in Ukraine, whether it is the use of Wagner-type mercenaries or systematic disinformation campaigns. On all these registers, it is the methodical character of the Russian advances which is striking in the face of the apparent impotence of Washington and the European powers to adapt to such an aggressive context. Moscow has indeed developed and learned to master maneuvers in Syria, admittedly unsophisticated, but which ensure that it retains the initiative against a Western camp always on the defensive and often divided. Clearly, Putin is firmly planted on his two legs, one European, the other Mediterranean, while his designated adversaries maintain the schizophrenia of an operational distinction between Ukraine and the Mediterranean.

The Kremlin does not bother with such rigidities, having dispatched its defense minister to Syria just nine days before the invasion of Ukraine. This trip obviously aimed to ensure the solidity of the Russian system in the eastern Mediterranean, shortly before an offensive that the general staff had already planned on the European front. On February 25, Bashar al-Assad also wished to congratulate his Russian counterpart for this “correction of history and this restoration of international balance, after the fall of the USSR”. But Moscow's planning is undoubtedly not limited to Syria, it takes into account possible points of support in eastern Libya, even the opportunity to impose itself in Algeria in the event of a conflict with the Morocco. While the world's attention is legitimately focused on Ukraine, Russia may already be preparing the next blow, no longer in the East, but in the South of Europe. Russian reinforcements have also just been sent to the eastern Mediterranean, with at least two attack submarines and two naval groups.

This catastrophic scenario may at this stage seem disheveled, except to forget that what until recently seemed inconceivable in Ukraine is unfolding before our eyes.
https://www.lemonde.fr/blog/filiu/2022/ ... iterranee/

I'm going to say an awful thing, because that's how it sounds. If only the first wave, in which the Russian General Staff has not yet launched its elite troops, just to assess the real capabilities of the adversary, new missiles
After Ukraine, war in the Mediterranean?
Putin's strategy has integrated the Mediterranean theater into the European front, the advances in Syria favoring the battering in Ukraine, with reinforcements sent to the eastern Mediterranean from the start of the current offensive.

[gegyx]

The point of view on the economy by "the investor without a suit"


There's plenty to do with all the items.

https://www.investisseur-sans-costume.com/

[Christophe]

I post it here...

Return of polio eradicated since 1984 in Great Britain following the administration of an "oral vaccine" which ended up in the London sewers.

It's WTF!