A world without money?

[Exnihiloest]

I have been in “bed & breakfast ” in the suburbs, maybe i fell badly but i hated
Once that was better, in a building where the stairs crossed the floors through the apartments without locked entrance doors ... and with my broken English at the time ... I had confused “upstairs”With“downstairs" I ran into a group of girls (big laughs) each one cuter than the next ... The confusion over and the presentations made, I won't say how it ended

But gastronomy in London ... Courage ... Let's run away ...

Gastronomy, almost everywhere there, is a disaster. This is not a received idea (for the rest, when you are accompanied, you cannot indulge in trying local specialties, even cute ones. , except to finish the trip alone).
However, I really liked my haddock for breakfast, served with a sauce like white butter but lighter, I still remember, I never thought it would go so well. But overall, and even in most European countries, the French suffer. It is especially the lack of variety, always the same things that come up, often it's heavy (Germany), and you can't even find a box of cassoulet in supermarkets, just to rebuild your health. Maybe in London? I do not understand why we have not succeeded in exporting such simple, practical and not bad things.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

No. Another drama of the taste for profit.

We see that you have never traveled to the United Kingdom. The fitting out and keeping of a guest room is the life and activity of common people. This is how I was able to dare the haddock for breakfast, the B&B was that of a Scottish fisherman's wife.
"Taste of Lucre" damn it is stupid.

Quote: "all these poor people who had bet on the accommodation of climatic refugees in guest rooms".
I was only talking about those. I have nothing against "bed and breakfast", on the contrary, I even had a good time there, of course, but not as a climate refugee. Damn that is stupid, indeed.

[Obamot]

...
For Exnihilo:
It's not on a mass scale, but it still exists.

It's not the ocean that rises, nothing to do with the climate, it's the beach that gets the hell out of it. Coastline specialists say these beaches are "getting thinner". These are local phenomena. In other places, it is the opposite, the silting up increases (beaches known as "in accretion"), like the bay of Aiguillon in Vendée since at least the Sixties, and which will probably end up being completely filled in. a more or less distant future, giving access to La Rochelle.
In Bretgagne, according to a 2018 study: "37% of the sandy shores of marine protected areas are eroding while 32% of them are in accretion" (source, "the coastline" in "The files of the environment in Brittany "). So it is more or less balanced.

It is also true, you can add the urbanization of the coast and the authorizations to build in flood-prone areas (which applies to the seafront subject to tides.)

However, “sea level rise” exists, 2mm per year, in constant value since the 19th century. This is one of the elements which tends to prove that the cause is not anthropogenic but cyclical (work of Milankovitch)

Sea level measurements from 23 tide gauge records in geologically stable environments show a rise of about 2 mm per year.

Honestly this is a stable upward trend, which does not really reflect the impact of the industrial age as an anthropogenic effect which would have been the predominant one that would have caused climate change to the level of what we know. (but I do not deny that there is an unabsorbed anthropogenic part of 0,33% (emission of Co²)

[eclectron]

the question was how the RCA could kill tens of millions of people per year

yes and if we are below, nothing happens, so the RCA, no problem?!
You always have a caricature (childish, not to say stupid) way of posing problems, without any global perspective.
So 5 million deaths per year, would that be acceptable?

no, that is precisely why I am telling you that certain experiences of societal reforms we will say "adventurous" ended in famines causing tens of millions of deaths - and there, unlike the RCA, it is not fantasies for in 50 years, it really happened, and it is historically attested.

And that's why I'm telling you that it's still worth looking at it twice before you want to revolutionize everything.

Yes, just as it is historically attested that when you take a piece of aluminum and drop it, it falls.
Except that we can make a plane out of that piece of aluminum and it flies.
Just to illustrate that your non-reasoning is a con because you knowledgeably ignore the changes in the initial conditions of the problem.
It is not because all the ideologies until today have led to more or less great disasters (including capitalism), that a new organization of society will lead to catastrophe.
As in the example of aluminum, heavier than air and which can fly, how a new organization of society would not allow an honorable comfort of life, an equity between men, over time?

[eclectron]

...
You can prepare your guest rooms.
...

This is what we were already told 10 years ago. And not a climate refugee! When I think of all these poor people who had bet on the accommodation of climate refugees in guest rooms, have swallowed all their money for nothing and find themselves in the straw. Another humanitarian drama!

Wait a little longer

https://www.lesechos.fr/2017/06/dici-la ... ite-173924

[sen-no-sen]

This position (of looking for refugees) is quite strange, you are looking in the future for something that already widely exists today ...
The concern is that the refugees would have to be "stamped" climate so that they can feed the emotional blood pressure monitor of viewers.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

This position (of looking for refugees) is quite strange, you are looking in the future for something that already widely exists today ...
The concern is that the refugees would have to be "stamped" climate so that they can feed the emotional blood pressure monitors of viewers.

Don't you think of the poor Thénardier who went out of their way to welcome labeled refugees and who see their profits pass under their noses? What a lack of consideration.

[Exnihiloest]

This is what we were already told 10 years ago. And not a climate refugee! When I think of all these poor people who had bet on the accommodation of climate refugees in guest rooms, have swallowed all their money for nothing and find themselves in the straw. Another humanitarian drama!

Wait a little longer

Promises, promises, always promises ...

... www.lesechos.fr/2017/06/dici-la-fin-du-siecle-les-vagues-de-chaleur-mortelles-toucheront-75-de-lhumanite-173924

Yes this is it. Climate refugees and deadly heat waves are like the end of the world: explained why we didn't get them and postponed when the promised date has passed.

Prophets, charlatans.

[Exnihiloest]

...
It is not because all the ideologies until today have led to more or less great disasters (including capitalism), that a new organization of society will lead to catastrophe.

Well no, obviously. It is even surely a sign to the contrary

Continually trying we finally succeed. So: the more it fails, the more likely it is to work.

Shadocktron proverb.

[eclectron]

Continually trying we finally succeed. So: the more it fails, the more likely it is to work.

“I haven't failed. I just found 10 solutions that don't work.” Thomas Edison

A little common sense and extrapolation, two qualities that people in denial are exempt from, would allow you to see the failure of your cherished capitalism.