A world without money?

[ABC2019]

Normally that's your trademark, can't you stand the competition?


the Mediterranean rim, Spain, Portugal, galloping demography, of course, and nothing for the RCA.
France ditto ...

it seems to me that all these countries have access to drinking water without too much problem, don't you think?

Yes yes and always the blinders by focusing on a particular point to better ignore the trend .....
Obviously dc since we prioritize water for humans

http://www.luso.fr/index.php/actualite/ ... A9orologie.

it was just to say that I do not think that it is these countries which are counted in the populations suffering from access to drinking water, I remind you that the question was to know how the RCA could make tens of millions deaths per year: but to die, there must still be something that prevents you from living, as M. de la Palisse would say: therefore, the RCA kills what, given that the whole deaths from all climatic disasters (including droughts), only 10 to 20 victims per year on average?

I don't mind worrying about the third decimal places, but here, we are still a factor of 1000 apart ...

[eclectron]

the question was how the RCA could kill tens of millions of people per year

yes and if we are below, nothing happens, so the RCA, no problem?!
You always have a caricature (childish, not to say stupid) way of posing problems, without any global perspective.
So 5 million deaths per year, would that be acceptable?

What I mean is that of the dead directly because of the RCA, if it happens there may be none, let's say few.
People are not idiots, when conditions put their lives at risk, after a while, they migrate.
You can prepare your guest rooms.
And France has 70 million or 140 million inhabitants, they are not at all the same living conditions, RCA and more ....
In short, it is to shift the problem and if you are still there, you can say that the deaths are not due to the RCA but to overpopulation and that you were right.
I am sorry for stupidity ... There would not have been the RCA ...

The smart thing (I know, it's beyond you) is to make sure to move as few parameters as possible and not to rush headlong towards more and more RCA.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

So 5 million deaths per year, would that be acceptable?

Benefit / risk, overcrowding, coughing and then "you don't make omelets without breaking eggs".

[ABC2019]

the question was how the RCA could kill tens of millions of people per year

yes and if we are below, nothing happens, so the RCA, no problem?!
You always have a caricature (childish, not to say stupid) way of posing problems, without any global perspective.
So 5 million deaths per year, would that be acceptable?

no, that is precisely why I am telling you that certain experiences of societal reforms we will say "adventurous" ended in famines causing tens of millions of deaths - and there, unlike the RCA, it is not fantasies for in 50 years, it really happened, and it is historically attested.

And that's why I'm telling you that it's still worth looking at it twice before you want to revolutionize everything.

[Exnihiloest]

...
You can prepare your guest rooms.
...

This is what we were already told 10 years ago. And not a climate refugee! When I think of all these poor people who had bet on the accommodation of climate refugees in guest rooms, have swallowed all their money for nothing and find themselves in the straw. Another humanitarian drama!

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Another humanitarian drama!

No. Another drama of the taste for profit.

[Obamot]

ABC2019 you burn the steps, you still have not answered that

In my opinion the problem is rather in the galloping demography in Africa which increases the population in an unreasonable way in the fragile zones, but that has nothing to do with the RCA.

That's a funny one ! Put anthropogenic RC on Africa's back and not on the super polluters that are America, China and the EU ... But say see Uncle ABC, this is how many% of the total volume releases Co² from the anthropic part? (we'll talk about methane next ...)

For Exnihilo:

It's not on a mass scale, but it still exists.

[Exnihiloest]

No. Another drama of the taste for profit.

We see that you have never traveled to the United Kingdom. The fitting out and keeping of a guest room is the life and activity of common people. This is how I was able to dare the haddock for breakfast, the B&B was that of a Scottish fisherman's wife.
"Taste of Lucre" damn it is stupid.

[Obamot]

I have been in “bed & breakfast ” in the suburbs, maybe i fell badly but i hated
Once that was better, in a building where the stairs crossed the floors through the apartments without locked entrance doors ... and with my broken English at the time ... I had confused “upstairs”With“downstairs" I ran into a group of girls (big laughs) each one cuter than the next ... The confusion over and the presentations made, I won't say how it ended

But gastronomy in London ... Courage ... Let's run away ...

[Exnihiloest]

...
For Exnihilo:

It's not on a mass scale, but it still exists.

It's not the ocean that rises, nothing to do with the climate, it's the beach that gets the hell out of it. Coastline specialists say these beaches are "getting thinner". These are local phenomena. In other places, it is the opposite, the silting up increases (beaches known as "in accretion"), like the bay of Aiguillon in Vendée since at least the Sixties, and which will probably end up being completely filled in. a more or less distant future, giving access to La Rochelle.
In Bretgagne, according to a 2018 study: "37% of the sandy shores of marine protected areas are eroding while 32% of them are in accretion" (source, "the coastline" in "The files of the environment in Brittany "). So it is more or less balanced.