Obamot wrote:
Finally I do not think of malevolence, but continue to publish on this subject, to aim what? A thread to 200 pages? And even a forum tacitly support the practice of "flood" and "troll"from more or less anonymous protagonist / s, ill-intentioned but very clever / s, because: completely rotten / s, crooked and infamous in their speech? And who are so many participation / s contrary to the ideas that are generally defended here. No, no and no. For what purpose then? More democracy in the debates? Increase the number of visitors to develop Google Ads? And subject to this dictate, to maintain a state of confrontation between a more or less organized rodeo and a perpetual buzz? Or to contribute to what should ultimately prevail for all the search for the truth?
Sorry but since it is not possible to know which are the true or false assumptions, the fact is that some are controlled in practice (if not all ...). And having regard to the ethical questions relating to the victims for whom I have the greatest respect, I cannot continue to lend myself to the little game of ping pong wanted and fed in a loop, whether because of behavior which borders on pathological or a mode of operation of the fo-fo involuntarily oriented and some of which abuse to put forward ...
So I definitely abandon this idea unless there is an explanation to back up on specific cases.
I rarely post on this forum. I just allow myself to react to this post which I find absolutely incredible. If you do not agree to be contradicted (which is obviously the case, given the contempt with which you consider opinions which are not yours), you must no longer post on a forum, which is meant to be a place of discussion. You have to create your own blog, that you lock the comments so that no one can pollute it with comments " completely rotten, crooked and infamous "and that will be better for everyone. I also find it very, very laughable to call a" troll "anything that does not agree with you.
Three remarks and then I go
-The violence of certain attacks against people (pb2488 in particular) who dare to have what is similar to a scientific approach (doubting, not accepting "a priori" each argument, asking for sources ...) debuts me .
- I work in renewable energies, it's my job. So a priori I am not fiercely pro-nuclear. But the way in which the divergent opinions (in particular that of pb2488, again him) are treated on another thread, would make me turn my jacket.
-I very gladly accept being fired from this forum if my conception of what life (on my opinion) should be forum is not shared here.
